Platelet Rich Plasma – what conditions can we recommend?

Platelet-rich plasma injection is not beneficial for nonoperative treatment of rotator cuff disease – 2019 Am Fam Physician 
After five years, platelet-rich plasma = hyaluronic acid injections for patients with knee osteoarthritis

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31730319/

Conclusions: The currently limited available evidence on PRP for nonoperative treatment of chronic rotator cuff disease suggests that in the short term, PRP injections may not be beneficial. When directly compared with exercise therapy, PRP does not result in superior functional outcomes, pain scores, or range of motion. However, interpretation of this literature is confounded by the lack of reporting of the cytology and characteristics of PRP.

Editorial Commentary: Sprinkle Some Pixie Dust on It-Are We Really Any Better at Understanding the Benefits of Platelet-Rich Plasma for Rotator Cuff Pathology?Platelet-rich plasma is used for the treatment of musculoskeletal ailments including rotator cuff pathology with mixed outcomes. Varied cytology and leukocyte counts within platelet-rich plasma may influence the results. The impact of this biological therapy on rotator cuff disease management is poorly understood.


 

Plateletrich therapies for musculoskeletal soft tissue injuries

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews – 2014 (no recent updates)

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24782334/

Authors’ conclusions: Overall, and for the individual clinical conditions, there is currently insufficient evidence to support the use of PRT for treating musculoskeletal soft tissue injuries. Researchers contemplating RCTs should consider the coverage of currently ongoing trials when assessing the need for future RCTs on specific conditions. There is need for standardisation of PRP preparation methods.


Efficacy of Platelet-Rich Plasma in the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28012636/#affiliation-2

Conclusions: Current evidence indicates that, compared with HA and saline, intra-articular PRP injection may have more benefit in pain relief and functional improvement in patients with symptomatic knee OA at 1 year postinjection.


The temporal effect of platelet-rich plasma on pain and physical function in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28115016/#affiliation-1

 

Results: Fourteen RCTs comprising 1423 participants were included. The control included saline placebo, HA, ozone, and corticosteroids. The follow-up ranged from 12 weeks to 12 months. Risk of bias assessment showed that 4 studies were considered as moderate risk of bias and 10 as high risk of bias. Compared with control, PRP injections significantly reduced WOMAC pain subscores at 3, 6, and 12 months follow-up (p = 0.02, 0.004, <0.001, respectively); PRP significantly improved WOMAC physical function subscores at 3, 6, and 12 months (p = 0.002, 0.01, <0.001, respectively); PRP also significantly improved total WOMAC scores at 3, 6 and 12 months (all p < 0.001); nonetheless, PRP did not significantly increased the risk of post-injection adverse events (RR, 1.40 [95% CI, 0.80 to 2.45], I 2 = 59%, p = 0.24).

Conclusions: Intra-articular PRP injections probably are more efficacious in the treatment of knee OA in terms of pain relief and self-reported function improvement at 3, 6 and 12 months follow-up, compared with other injections, including saline placebo, HA, ozone, and corticosteroids.


Platelet-rich plasma versus hyaluronic acid in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis: A meta-analysis

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32176063/

Results: A total of 14 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving 1350 patients were included. Long-term VAS, IKDC, WOMAC-Pain, WOMAC-Stiffness, WOMAC-Physical Function, and WOMAC-Total scores at each time point were higher in the PRP group than in the HA group. There were no significant differences in the remaining indicators between the two groups.

Conclusion: Compared with HA, PRP offers obvious advantages in the conservative treatment of knee osteoarthritis. Treatment with PRP can reduce long-term pain and improve knee joint function with no additional risks. Therefore, PRP can be widely used for the conservative treatment of knee osteoarthritis.

Platelet-Rich Plasma Versus Hyaluronic Acid Injections for the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis: Results at 5 Years of a Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial

Conclusion: Both treatments were effective in improving knee functional status and symptoms over time. PRP did not provide an overall superior clinical improvement compared with HA in terms of either symptomatic-functional improvement at different follow-up points or effect duration.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *